Court Upholds Standard Insurance Company's Denial Of Disability Benefits, Despite Claimant's Approval Of Social Security Disability Benefits

For several years, Elizabeth Black was the executive director of Milwaukee World Festival, Inc. (MWF), the organization that governs Summerfest, a music festival in Milwaukee. Black was covered under the company’s disability insurance plan, underwritten and administered by Standard Insurance Company. Black was diagnosed with multiple aortic aneurysms bulging and weak areas in the aorta. In 2001, Black had surgery to repair the aneurysms and was recommended by her doctor to medically manage a third aneurysm in the descending aorta.

After surgery and recuperation, Black went back to work in the summer of 2001 being monitored closely by her doctor, Dr. Brian Griffin, as well as her cardiologist, Dr. David Slosky for hypertension. At the end of 2002, Black was in contract negotiations, trying to land another five year contract with MWF, but at the same, time her relationship with co-workers was strained to the point that she was experiencing harassment. In a letter sent to the counsel for MWF, Black complained about her co-workers, the harassment and her desire for a new contract. She sent letters from her two doctors as well as her neurologist Dr. Griffin explained that Black, “has significant hypertensive problems . . . it is vital that her blood pressure be well controlled. Stress, particularly in the form of verbal abuse, is very deleterious for her blood pressure control”

Dr. Slosky wrote that Black, “has significant hypertension . . . her blood pressure is quite labile and reactive to stressful conditions. It is particularly sensitive to acute and direct confrontation. . . . The patient should not be subject to harassment of this kind.” And the neurologist, Dr. Eric Maas, wrote, “any undue stress should be minimized given Black's medical history particularly with regard to hypertension and her vascular disease,” and that “had been undergoing a great deal of stress stemming from her responsibilities as Director of Summerfest in Milwaukee and her contract negotiations,” and he requested “that these factors be taken into account in planning these negotiations with Elizabeth.”

In July 2003, the committee voted not to renew Black’s contract. On August 6, 2003, Mrs. Black filed a disability claim with Standard Insurance Company. Black sent a letter to the board of directors, stating that she was unable to perform her duties and that doctors had advised her that she could no longer work – that her condition had been worsened by her job activities and stress.

Standard reviewed medical records from Dr. Griffin and Dr. Slosky and Dr. Michael Deeken, Black’s psychiatrist. They also received an ‘attending physician statement’ from Dr. Griffin, stating that he had advised her to stop working as of 2003, and that she is unable to control her blood pressure. On visits to Dr. Slosky on August 2001, July 2002, and July 2003, records revealed that Black’s health was stable, with the exception of poorly controlled hypertension.

Dr. Slosky wrote a letter to the Standard Insurance Company, stating that that Black should cease working due to poor blood pressure control and the “potential for aneurysm enlargement/dissection.” Her psychologist, Dr. Deeken also submitted a statement that Mrs. Black had a diagnosis of depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Adding more evidence to her case, Mrs. Black submitted a copy of the Social Security Administration’s approval of her disability benefits. She had been considered disabled due to aortic disorders and anxiety disorders by the SSA, and was considered disabled by another disability insurance company, from which she had additional coverage.

Standard denied Mrs. Black’s claim for disability benefits, stating there was not enough evidence to consider her disabled under the plan. However, she appealed the denial, including additional letters from her doctors, who stated that Black had experienced fatigue and concentration problems. She also submitted letters from friends and family that had witnessed her concentration and memory problems. Standard then consulted four physicians, who took a look at Black’s medical records and evidence. Each of them concluded that Black was not disabled, while Dr. Fraback (one of the reviewing doctors) suggested Standard consult a cardiologist, which they did.

Two cardiologists – Drs. Kent Williamson and Storm Floten reviewed the charts. Dr. Williamson noted that while stress may reduce the risk of an aneurysm rupture, that Black’s condition could be managed with medication and that since her scans had not shown any significant change, there was no solid evidence that she was unable to work. Dr. Floten gave his opinion that Black’s aneurysm had not been affected by her job and that the “descending aorta has not enlarged significantly in the last three years.”

Both had concluded that she was not disabled. Dr. Gwinnell, a psychiatrist was consulted by Standard, who reviewed Black’s claim and stated that her complaints of fatigue and cognitive difficulties was not supported by her medical records. On January 2005, Black took the case to the district court, where she was ruled against. She appealed again to the United States Court of Appeals to the Seventh Circuit.

Black’s case was reviewed; specifically the fact that Standard denied Black while the SSA approved her. It was found that the medical information given to the SSA was not the same information given to Standard, and therefore, that Standard was not opposing the SSA, but that the cases were completely different. The court also found that the physician’s reports were conflicting and shifted to support Black’s disability claim. The court therefore supported the district court’s decision to rule for Standard.

*About the Author: Gregory Michael Dell is an attorney and managing partner of the disability income division of Attorneys Dell and Schaefer (www.diattorney.com). Mr. Dell and his team of lawyers have assisted thousands of long-term disability claimants with their claims against every major disability insurance company. He can be reached at 888-SAY-Dell or gdell@diattorney.com.
 

Former Government Bond Trader And 9-11 Survivor Receives More Than One Million Dollars In Long-Term Disability Benefits

Prior to September 11, 2001 our client, Mr. B, was a government securities repo trader. His office was located on the 26th Floor of Tower 1 of the World Trade Center. On the morning of September 11, 2001, Mr. B reported to work at his brokerage firm and started his day buying and selling government securities for his commercial clients, institutions such as Bank of Tokyo and Lehman Brothers. At around 8:45 a.m., Mr. B and his co-workers heard a loud explosion and felt the building shake, ceiling tiles began falling in Mr. B’s office and thick smoke filled the hallways and stairwells. Fifty minutes later, after descending 26 floors of smoke, heat, and chaos, Mr. B was out of Tower 1. Mr. B’s life was forever changed that day and nightmares of his escape would haunt him for years.

Mr. B, like many of his co-workers, returned to work, this time across the river in New Jersey with an unobstructed view of the altered New York City skyline. For two years following September 11th, Mr. B reported for work despite battling daily depression and severe anxiety resulting from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. He was no longer the same person. Mr. B’s medical condition made it difficult for him to work. The nightmares were daily and he was finding it impossible to effectively perform his job duties in the high stress and cut throat trading pit in which he worked. Mr. B sought help from mental health experts, but despite his treatment, his symptoms continued to worsen to the point that he was forced to stop working and file for long-term disability benefits with his disability insurance carrier. Mr. B had purchased his long-term disability policy from his insurance agent approximately 10 years prior to his date of disability.

In 2003, upon review of the abundance of medical support from his therapist and treating psychiatrist, his disability insurer determined Mr. B was totally disabled and began paying benefits. For approximately three years, Mr. B’s long-term disability insurance carrier paid him without any problems. Shortly thereafter, Mr. B’s disability insurer began questioning the extent of his limitations and restrictions. It was at this point that Mr. B hired Attorneys Dell & Schaefer to assist him in dealing with the various requests which were being made by his disability insurance company.

Mr. B’s disability carrier requested that he undergo an independent medical examination. Not long after the IME the insurer terminated Mr. B’s benefits relying greatly on the opinion of the insurance company’s hired independent psychiatrist and claiming that Mr. B was at best partially disabled but since he was not gainfully employed - a requisite to being partially disabled under Mr. B’s disability policy - he was not eligible to receive partial disability benefits.

In 2006, Attorneys Dell & Schaefer appealed the denial of benefits with the disability insurer and successfully had the denial overturned. The disability carrier continued to pay total disability benefits for another 2 years, however, in late 2008 the disability carrier sought the opinion of the same independent psychiatrist and again found cause to terminate benefits. Attorneys Cesar Gavidia and Gregory Dell began preparing the case for litigation. Prior to filing suit, the parties agreed to participate in mediation as a method of attempting to resolve the dispute. Mediation took place in New York City where the parties were able to successfully reach a confidential settlement which involved a complete lump-sum buyout of Mr. B’s long-term disability policy.