In the latter part of May, complaint after complaint was filed against Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston from shore to shore.

Senior Administrative Analyst Sues Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston For Disability Benefits And Seeks more than five million dollars in damages

In Margie Mauro v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Delicia Haynes, an employee of Commercial Metals Company has filed a lawsuit against Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston to collect her long overdue disability benefits. A data entry clerical assistant at Commercial Metals Company, Haynes was denied her disability application for long term disability in a letter from Liberty Life Assurance, dated March 13

In Lamont Philip Richardson Vs Unum Group Corporation And First Horizon National Corporation, the disability insurance claimant alleged that he was improperly denied of his claim for long term disability (LTD) benefits by Unum. A lawsuit was filed for the recovery of disability benefits under an employee benefits plan and for enforcement of rights

Disability Lawyer Files Lawsuit Against Liberty Mutual

In the case of Georgia Lewis Vs Liberty Life Assurance Company Of Boston, Wachovia Corporation And Wachovia Corporation Long Term Disability Plan, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Liberty Life Assurance Company Of Boston (Liberty Life) at the District Court For The District Of New Jersey.

In two recent separate cases, an employee of Wells Fargo & Company (Wells Fargo) and an employee of Filtrona Greensboro, Inc. filed lawsuits in California and North Carolina respectively, through their disability attorneys, against the Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston (Liberty Life) for violations of the provisions of Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

June 22, 2011 – A recent opinion from the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals has helped clarify the rules as to who you can sue in actions for benefits under a long term disability policy See Cyr v. Reliance Standard & Channel Technologies, 2011 WL 2464440, June 22, 2011. The Court concluded