This Week on DIAttorney.com (03/26/2011)

Disability Blog & Cases:
Disability benefits lawsuit against Fortis Benefits Insurance Company dismissed by West Virginia Federal Court

Failing to comply with administrative requirements in a timely manner as specified by Fortis Benefits Insurance Company resulted in Elizabeth A. Bailey being denied benefits from her deceased husband’s short-term disability benefits, long-term disability benefits and life insurance policies. Having neglected to follow proper ERISA procedures in pursuing long-term disability and life insurance benefits from Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Assurant) as specified in Fortis’s policy requirements, Elizabeth Bailey forfeited her opportunity to present her case to a federal court when her complaint was dismissed by the Court’s ruling on two motions for summary judgment filed by Fortis’s disability defense attorneys.


FAQ: Attorney Fees & Representation:
Can a disability attorney manage all aspects of my long-term disability insurance claim?

What amounts to a business decision for your disability insurance company is a life decision for you as a disability benefit recipient. Your disability insurance company views you as a piece of paper, some medical documents, a persistent headache, and a drain on their bottom line. Your monthly disability payment is your home, your groceries, your health care—your livelihood; and you don’t trust your disability insurance provider to make sure that your interests are being taken care off. Consequently, much of your precious time may be spent dealing with your disability insurance provider to make sure you receive your monthly disability payment.

This Week on DIAttorney.com (03/19/2011)

Disability Blog & Cases:
Disability lawsuit against MetLife alleges insurance company refuses to pay disabled claimant

The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, known as MetLife (NYSE: MET), is being sued in United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, for refusing to honor its contractual obligation to pay long term disability insurance benefits to a psychologically impaired woman.


Disability Blog & Cases:
Liberty Mutual sued in Tampa Federal Court for denying long term disability insurance benefits

An ERISA disability lawsuit was filed against the Liberty Life Assurance Company, this time in Federal Court in the Middle District of Florida. Andrea Medders was forced to file suit after her administrative appeals were denied and Liberty Life, also known as Liberty Mutual refused to pay her long term disability benefits.


Disability Blog & Cases:
CIGNA/LINA sued for denying waiver of life insurance premium to caretaker of disabled and mentally challenged adults

After repeated appeals asking CIGNA / LINA to change their decision regarding denial of waiver of life insurance premiums due to total disability, Wendy Magee was recently forced to hire Michigan disability attorneys and file an ERISA disability lawsuit in the Federal Court of the Western District of Michigan.


Disability Blog & Cases:
Federal Court provides 5 reasons CIGNA wrongfully denied disability benefits to man suffering from chronic fatigue syndromes

Citing a financial incentive to cheat, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently overruled the decision of CIGNA (CI) to deny disability benefits to a man suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome. For anyone disabled by chronic fatigue or fibromyalgia this is a very supportive case and great law. The court provided five reasons that Cigna abused its discretion by denying disability insurance benefits. Let’s take a close at the case history and the court’s reasoning.

This Week on DIAttorney.com (03/12/2011)

Disability Blog & Cases:
Hartford Financial’s mental nervous disorder limitation clause in disability insurance policy held ambiguous

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently ordered a lower court to reconsider its decision that had affirmed Hartford Financial Insurance Company‘s denial of a woman’s claim for disability benefits. Although the claimant has not yet been awarded her requested disability benefits, the Appeals Court’s decision leaves her one step closer to achieving this goal.


Disability Blog & Cases:
Life Insurance Company of North America, part of CIGNA Corporation, sued for refusing disability insurance benefits for mentally ill teacher

Disability Insurance Attorneys Dell and Schaefer filed a Federal Lawsuit against Life Insurance Company of North America (LINA), which is part of CIGNA Corp (CI.N). The lawsuit was filed after Cigna refused to pay disability benefits to a Florida teacher forced to stop working due to mental health issues such as depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.


Disability Blog & Cases:
Federal lawsuit against Hartford Insurance alleges company refuses to pay disabled Patriot Act analyst

A Federal lawsuit filed in United States District Court Southern District of Florida accuses the Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company of breaching its contract with Branch Banking and Trust (BB&T) and a BB&T employee. Filed by noted disability insurance law firm of Dell & Schafer, the suit states that Hartford is refusing to pay benefits to the employee, a U.S. Patriot Act/Anti-Money Laundering Analyst. The refusal by The Hartford violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, commonly referred to as ERISA.


Disability Blog & Cases:
Disability insurance lawsuit against Guardian Life Insurance serves as warning to doctors

A lawsuit filed in the United States Southern District Court of New York reveals that The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America is refusing to pay long term disability insurance benefits to a New Jersey OB/GYN critically injured in a car accident.

This Week on DIAttorney.com (03/05/2011)

Disability Blog & Cases:
Disability insurance benefits lawsuit against Prudential Insurance Company is dismissed by Pennsylvania Judge

A Federal District Court in Pennsylvania recently dismissed the case of a long-term disability claimant who claimed damages resulting from Prudential Insurance Company‘s delay in the approval of her claim for long-term disability insurance benefits. Although the claimant was eventually awarded disability benefits by Prudential Insurance Company, she still filed a lawsuit for the damages she allegedly suffered due to the carrier’s delay in approving her disability benefits. The Court ultimately dismissed all of her claims against the carrier for the delay. As a disability insurance law firm that handles cases nationwide, it appears that the lawyer who filed this lawsuit was not a Pennsylvania disability insurance attorney. This case provides a good summary of how restrictive and unfair ERISA can be, but an experienced disability insurance lawyer would not have filed this disability lawsuit against Prudential. Check out our video on why ERISA is an unfair law. To understand the Court’s ruling, let’s take a look at the case of Carolyn Jobe v. Prudential.


Disability Blog & Cases:
Michigan Court determines Sedgwick wrongly terminated woman’s disability benefits and awards Michigan disability attorney his fees

A recent opinion from the United States District Court in the Eastern District of Michigan shows how difficult it can be get a court to award disability benefits instead of just remanding a wrongful termination decision back to the plan administrator. Although the Court in this action remanded the case back to the plan administrator for a new review, it did award the claimant’s Michigan disability attorney partial attorney’s fees. To understand the Court’s decision, lets take a closer look at the case of Luda Blajei.


Disability Blog & Cases:
Ohio National Life Insurance loves to tell disabled doctor “no”

As disability attorneys we deal with long term disability insurance carriers such as Ohio National Life Insurance Company on daily basis. Most insurance companies do not have good reputations for fair claim handling so it is not unusual for our attorneys to encounter some opposition while handling a disability insurance claim. The conduct of Ohio National in a long term disability claim our lawyers are handling on behalf of a family medicine physician is disturbing. The conduct is even more disturbing because Ohio National’s most recent letter states, “Ohio National has acted reasonably and fairly in the handling of [Dr. X's] claim.” While our client continues to be paid disability insurance benefits each month, Ohio seems to thinks that by paying disability benefits they are acting reasonably.